§ 4-32. The bank must refund the amount quickly when the customer disputes liability

The Financial Contracts Act (Finansavtaleloven)·LOV-2020-12-18-146

Machine-translated from Norwegian. The Norwegian text is the one that applies. Read the original in Norwegian.Norsk English العربية Polski Українська

In brief

The text of the law (unofficial translation)

§ 4-32. The service provider's (tjenesteyter) duty to refund the amount when the customer disputes liability under § 4-30

(1) To the extent that the customer, as a result of the rules in § 4-30, disputes liability for an unauthorised payment transaction (betalingstransaksjon), the payment service provider (betalingstjenesteyter) shall immediately, and no later than by the end of the following business day, refund the amount and compensate for loss of interest from the time of the debit. However, this applies only if the customer has given notice in time under § 4-24 second paragraph. The duty to refund under the first sentence does not apply to the excess under § 4-30 second paragraph.
(2) The first paragraph does not apply if the payment service provider has reasonable grounds to suspect fraud and, within four weeks of receiving a written objection from the customer, brings legal proceedings or brings the case before an established complaints board approved pursuant to law. The writ of summons or complaint must be in writing and state the grounds. If the case is dismissed by the complaints board or a court, a new deadline of four weeks runs from the day the payment service provider became aware of the dismissal. If the court or established complaints board concludes that there is no reasonable suspicion that the customer had acted fraudulently, the payment service provider is liable for late payment interest on the amount from the day it should have been refunded under the first paragraph.
(3) If a payment initiation service provider (betalingsfullmektig) is involved in an unauthorised payment transaction, the account provider (kontotilbyder) is responsible for the refund under the first paragraph. If the payment initiation service provider is responsible for the unauthorised payment transaction, it shall, at the request of the account's payment service provider, immediately indemnify the latter, cf. § 4-33.
(4) The payment service provider may demand that a third party repay funds that the third party has wrongfully received as a result of an unauthorised payment transaction. Any repaid amount exceeding the payment service provider's loss shall be used to cover the customer's share of the loss.
Source: Lovdata — Finansavtaleloven (the Financial Contracts Act) § 4-32

What does this mean?

This section gives the customer a quick right to get the money back while the dispute is ongoing. If the customer disputes being liable for an unauthorised payment under § 4-30, the bank must refund the amount immediately and no later than by the end of the next business day. The bank must also compensate for the loss of interest from the time of the debit. The claim applies only if the customer gave notice in time under § 4-24 second paragraph. The excess under § 4-30 second paragraph is not included and can be withheld.

The second paragraph gives the bank a way out if it suspects fraud. If the bank has reasonable grounds to believe that the customer has acted fraudulently, it does not have to refund, but only if it takes the case to court or to an approved complaints board within four weeks of the customer's written objection. The writ of summons or complaint must be in writing and state the grounds. If the case is dismissed, a new four-week deadline starts on the day the bank learned of the dismissal. If the court or the complaints board concludes that the suspicion was not reasonable, the bank must pay late payment interest from the day the amount should have been refunded.

The third and fourth paragraphs concern who ultimately bears the cost. If a payment initiation service provider is involved, the account provider is responsible for the refund. If the payment initiation service provider is itself responsible for the transaction, it must immediately indemnify the bank on request. The bank can also demand the money back from a third party who has received it without being entitled to it. If the bank recovers more than its own loss, the surplus must cover the customer's share of the loss.

Example: The customer disputes a debit and has reported it in time. The bank must then refund the amount by the end of the next business day, except for any excess. If the bank has a reasonable suspicion that the customer is behind it, it can refrain from refunding, but it must then have brought legal proceedings or filed a complaint against the customer with an approved complaints board within four weeks.

This section depends on the neighbouring rules. The liability rules in § 4-30 decide whether the customer can be held liable at all, and § 4-31 allows the liability to be reduced. Section 4-33 governs the banks' ability to claim compensation (erstatning) from whoever caused the loss.

Related sections
All sections of the Financial Contracts Act →
Questions about this section