§ 4-32. The bank must refund the amount quickly when the customer disputes liability
Machine-translated from Norwegian. The Norwegian text is the one that applies. Read the original in Norwegian.Norsk English العربية Polski Українська
In brief
- If the customer (kunde) disputes liability and gave notice in time, the bank must refund the amount no later than the next business day (virkedag).
- The excess (egenandel) under § 4-30 second paragraph is not included.
- The bank can avoid refunding if it has reasonable suspicion of fraud, provided it takes the case to court or a complaints board (klageorgan) within four weeks.
- If the court or the complaints board does not rule in the bank's favour, the bank must pay late payment interest (forsinkelsesrente).
The text of the law (unofficial translation)
§ 4-32. The service provider's (tjenesteyter) duty to refund the amount when the customer disputes liability under § 4-30
What does this mean?
This section gives the customer a quick right to get the money back while the dispute is ongoing. If the customer disputes being liable for an unauthorised payment under § 4-30, the bank must refund the amount immediately and no later than by the end of the next business day. The bank must also compensate for the loss of interest from the time of the debit. The claim applies only if the customer gave notice in time under § 4-24 second paragraph. The excess under § 4-30 second paragraph is not included and can be withheld.
The second paragraph gives the bank a way out if it suspects fraud. If the bank has reasonable grounds to believe that the customer has acted fraudulently, it does not have to refund, but only if it takes the case to court or to an approved complaints board within four weeks of the customer's written objection. The writ of summons or complaint must be in writing and state the grounds. If the case is dismissed, a new four-week deadline starts on the day the bank learned of the dismissal. If the court or the complaints board concludes that the suspicion was not reasonable, the bank must pay late payment interest from the day the amount should have been refunded.
The third and fourth paragraphs concern who ultimately bears the cost. If a payment initiation service provider is involved, the account provider is responsible for the refund. If the payment initiation service provider is itself responsible for the transaction, it must immediately indemnify the bank on request. The bank can also demand the money back from a third party who has received it without being entitled to it. If the bank recovers more than its own loss, the surplus must cover the customer's share of the loss.
Example: The customer disputes a debit and has reported it in time. The bank must then refund the amount by the end of the next business day, except for any excess. If the bank has a reasonable suspicion that the customer is behind it, it can refrain from refunding, but it must then have brought legal proceedings or filed a complaint against the customer with an approved complaints board within four weeks.
This section depends on the neighbouring rules. The liability rules in § 4-30 decide whether the customer can be held liable at all, and § 4-31 allows the liability to be reduced. Section 4-33 governs the banks' ability to claim compensation (erstatning) from whoever caused the loss.
- § 4-30Who pays the loss when the card or account is misused
- § 4-24The customer's duty to give notice of misuse and errors, and the deadline for correction
- § 4-33The banks' right of recourse (regress) when someone else caused the loss
- § 4-31Reduction of the customer's liability for misuse of a payment instrument (betalingsinstrument)
- § 3-31Information on security and liability for payment services (betalingstjeneste)