§ 3-1. Opening of debt negotiation and conditions for opening

The Debt Settlement Act (Gjeldsordningsloven)·LOV-1992-07-17-99

Machine-translated from Norwegian. The Norwegian text is the one that applies. Read the original in Norwegian.Norsk English العربية Polski Українська

In brief

The text of the law (unofficial translation)

§ 3-1. The enforcement authorities' opening of debt negotiation and setting of conditions for opening

If the conditions in §§ 1-2 to 1-4 are met, and the application (søknaden) meets the requirements in § 2-1, the district court shall open debt negotiation. In cases where it is obvious that the conditions are met, debt negotiation may be opened by the enforcement officer.
The enforcement authorities may set conditions for opening debt negotiation, including conditions that the sale or valuation of assets has been carried out. If it is the court (retten) that has set conditions, the enforcement officer sends the case back to the court for a decision on opening when the condition has been met.
The decision on whether debt negotiation shall be opened is made by the court by court ruling (kjennelse) or by the enforcement officer by written decision.
The enforcement officer's decision to open debt negotiations may be appealed by the creditors (fordringshaverne) within one week after the enforcement officer has sent notice of the opening of debt negotiation, cf. § 3-2 second paragraph. The enforcement authorities' decision to open debt negotiation on conditions may also be appealed or appealed to a higher court (anke) by the debtor (skyldneren). The district court's decision to open debt negotiation without conditions is final.
Source: Lovdata — Gjeldsordningsloven (the Debt Settlement Act) § 3-1

What does this mean?

The section says who opens the debt negotiation, and what happens when it has been opened. The main rule is that the district court opens the negotiation when the conditions in §§ 1-2 to 1-4 are fulfilled and the application has the content that § 2-1 requires. If it is obvious that the conditions are met, the enforcement officer can do the job itself.

The enforcement authorities (namsmyndigheten) (the enforcement officer or the court) can attach conditions to the opening. As an example, the law mentions that the sale or valuation of assets must have been done first. If it is the court that has set the condition, the case goes back there from the enforcement officer when the condition has been fulfilled, and the court then decides whether the negotiation is opened.

The form of the decision depends on who makes it. The court uses a court ruling, while the enforcement officer uses a written decision.

The fourth paragraph regulates appeals. When the enforcement officer has opened the negotiation, the creditors can appeal within one week after they received notice of the opening. The notice is regulated in § 3-2 second paragraph. If the negotiation is opened on conditions, the debtor can also appeal or appeal to a higher court. If the district court opens without conditions, the decision cannot be challenged. A constructed example: a debtor is granted an opening, but only on the condition that an asset is sold. The debtor thinks the condition is unreasonable and can then appeal or appeal to a higher court, while a creditor who thinks the enforcement officer has opened too readily must appeal within the short deadline.

The section is the first in chapter 3. Right after the opening come the public notice (kunngjøring) and the call to submit claims in § 3-2, securing of assets and wage deductions in § 3-3, payment suspension (betalingsutsettelse) in § 3-4 and the debtor's obligations in § 3-5. The case can also be dismissed during the debt negotiation period (gjeldsforhandlingsperiode) under § 3-7.

Related sections
All §§ in the Debt Settlement Act →