§ 3-46. Sanctions for breach of financial agreements (finansavtaler)
Machine-translated from Norwegian. The Norwegian text is the one that applies. Read the original in Norwegian.Norsk English العربية Polski Українська
In brief
- A breach of § 3-1 first paragraph gives a right to cancellation of the contract (heving) and compensation (erstatning), except for circumstances the service provider (tjenesteyter) is not responsible for.
- A breach of the duty to provide information only counts if it has affected the agreement.
- The service provider cannot use a breach of another agreement as grounds for cancellation of the contract or for making a claim fall due.
- Other claims under general rules still apply.
The text of the law (unofficial translation)
§ 3-46. Sanctions for breach
What does this mean?
This section says what the customer can do when the service provider breaches its obligations, and what the service provider can do when the customer is in breach. A breach of the general duty of care in § 3-1 first paragraph can give the customer the right to cancel the agreement under § 3-48 and claim compensation under § 3-49. The exception is breaches caused by the customer themselves or by circumstances the service provider is not responsible for. § 3-1 first paragraph requires, among other things, that the service provider acts honestly, fairly, professionally and with due care.
For breaches of the duty to provide information, the threshold is higher. A sanction applies only if the breach must be assumed to have affected the agreement. Nor can the customer rely on shortcomings in information that the customer knew about, or should have known about, when the agreement was entered into. If the customer has been told the main characteristics of the service and, without good reason, ignores a request to read up on information, the customer cannot later complain about what following the request would have revealed. This requires that the service provider gave the information as the law or the agreement requires.
The service provider can cancel the contract when the customer is in breach, on the conditions in § 3-51. However, the law blocks so-called cross-default: the service provider cannot agree on a right to cancel or terminate, or to treat a monetary claim as due, because the customer has breached another agreement or another claim. An example using the law's roles: a customer has failed to pay another monetary claim. The service provider cannot use that as grounds to cancel an entirely different agreement with the customer.
This section does not remove other claims the parties have under general rules. The service provider must still correct errors and take other measures to fulfil its obligations under § 3-1. The customer's right to cancel the contract is regulated in more detail in § 3-48, compensation in § 3-49, notice of complaint (reklamasjon) in § 3-47 and exemption from liability in extraordinary circumstances in § 3-50.
- § 3-1The service provider's general obligations towards the customer
- § 3-51The service provider's right to cancel the agreement
- § 3-48The customer's right to cancel the agreement in the event of breach
- § 3-49Compensation when the service provider breaches its obligations
- § 3-47Deadline for notice of complaint when the service provider has made a mistake