§ 5-5. Consequences when the bank breaches the duty to assess creditworthiness or the duty to refuse credit

The Financial Contracts Act (Finansavtaleloven)·LOV-2020-12-18-146

Machine-translated from Norwegian. The Norwegian text is the one that applies. Read the original in Norwegian.Norsk English العربية Polski Українська

In brief

The text of the law (unofficial translation)

§ 5-5. Breach of the duty to carry out a credit assessment or the duty to refuse credit

(1) If the lender (kredittyter) has not assessed the customer's creditworthiness under § 5-2 or has granted credit in breach of § 5-4, the duty to limit loss under § 3-49 fourth paragraph second sentence cannot be invoked to the detriment of a customer who is a consumer. Contract terms as mentioned in § 2-10 and contract terms as mentioned in § 5-8 third sentence are not binding on the customer either, who may instead demand the market interest rate.
(2) If the lender has granted credit in breach of § 5-4, the customer's obligations under the agreement may be reduced to the extent that is reasonable. In assessing whether the obligations should be reduced, weight may be given to how the result of the credit assessment was communicated to the customer, and how the lender has otherwise fulfilled the duty to explain under § 5-1.
(3) The lender cannot terminate or change a credit agreement (kredittavtale) to the detriment of the customer on the grounds that the credit assessment was not carried out correctly, unless the error is due to circumstances on the customer's side and gives the lender the right to terminate the agreement under § 3-51.
Source: Lovdata — Finansavtaleloven (the Financial Contracts Act) § 5-5

What does this mean?

This section is the sanction rule for the credit assessment and the duty to refuse credit. If the bank has not assessed the customer's creditworthiness under § 5-2, or has granted a loan in breach of § 5-4, the consumer gets stronger protection on three points.

First, the bank cannot use the duty to limit loss against the consumer. This duty is set out in § 3-49 fourth paragraph. It states that compensation (erstatning) can be reduced if the injured party has failed to limit the loss, but subject to § 5-5. Second, two types of terms are not binding. One is terms on losses from early repayment of a fixed-rate loan (fastrentekreditt) under § 2-10. The other is the terms on insurance and account agreement (kontoavtale) that § 5-8 third sentence permits. Instead, the customer can demand the market interest rate.

The second paragraph applies when the bank has granted credit in breach of § 5-4. In that case, the customer's obligations can be reduced to the extent that is reasonable. In the assessment, weight may be given to how the result of the credit assessment was communicated, and whether the bank has otherwise fulfilled the duty to explain under § 5-1. The bank therefore cannot expect to get off simply because the customer received money.

The third paragraph protects the customer against the bank using an error in its own credit assessment as a pretext. The bank cannot terminate or change the agreement to the customer's detriment on those grounds. The exception is where the error is due to circumstances on the customer's side and at the same time gives a right of termination under § 3-51, for example where information has deliberately been withheld or falsified.

The rules build on §§ 5-1 to 5-4 of the chapter, and § 6-1 refers to this section for personal guarantees (kausjon). Example: The bank has granted a loan to a consumer without assessing creditworthiness. Later, the bank wants its losses covered on early repayment of a fixed-rate loan. The term on loss compensation is then not binding on the customer, who only needs to pay the market interest rate.

Related sections
All sections of the Financial Contracts Act →