§ 19. A litigation notice can protect a claim against several debtors
If you have started proceedings against one of several debtors in time, the claim (krav) can also be treated as brought in time against the others if you send a litigation notice (prosessvarsel) before limitation (foreldelse) occurs. You must then pursue the claim against them within 1 year after the case has ended. The rule also applies when the claim depends on a legal relationship that is already the subject of a case.
Machine-translated from Norwegian. The Norwegian text is the one that applies. Read the original in Norwegian.Norsk English العربية Polski Українська
The text of the law (unofficial translation)
1. If proceedings in accordance with §§ 15 or 16 no. 1 have been initiated in due time against one of several debtors (skyldnere), the claim (fordring) shall be deemed to have been asserted in due time against the others when the creditor (fordringshaver), before limitation has occurred, has given them notice of the proceedings in the manner laid down in the Dispute Act (tvisteloven) § 15-9, and subsequently pursues their claim against the person concerned within 1 year after the case has ended by settlement (forlik), judgment (dom) or otherwise. 2. The same rule applies when the claim depends on a legal relationship about which a case has been brought by or against the creditor.
What does this mean?
§ 19 is about several possible debtors. Sometimes you know that several people or companies may be liable for the same claim. Perhaps you have a claim against both a contractor and a subcontractor. Perhaps several people have signed for the same liability. Perhaps you do not know which of them the court will ultimately hold liable.
You can then end up with a deadline problem. You start proceedings against one of them in time. But what about the others? If you wait until the case is over, the limitation period (foreldelsesfrist) against the others may have run out. § 19 offers a solution: a litigation notice.
A litigation notice means that you notify a person or business that legal proceedings are under way that may affect them. The notice must be given in the manner set out in the Dispute Act § 15-9. A casual text message is not enough. It must be a proper formal notice.
The first paragraph says that if you have initiated proceedings under § 15 or § 16 no. 1 in time against one of several debtors, the claim can be deemed asserted in time against the others as well. But three conditions must be met.
First, the case against the one debtor must have been started in time. This can be legal action (rettslige skritt) under § 15, or a case before a public authority (forvaltningsorgan) under § 16 no. 1.
Second, you must notify the others before limitation has occurred. This is important. A litigation notice under § 19 must be sent before the deadline runs out for the others.
Third, you must later pursue the claim against the person concerned within 1 year after the first case has ended. The case may have ended by settlement, judgment or otherwise. So you do not get unlimited time. A litigation notice gives you a bridge, not an everlasting pause.
The second paragraph says that the same rule applies when the claim depends on a legal relationship about which a case has been brought by or against you. This means the rule can also be used when your claim depends on the outcome of another case. If a judgment in another case decides the basis for your claim, a litigation notice may be important.
When do you need a litigation notice?
You need a litigation notice when several parties may be liable and you do not want to, or cannot, sue all of them at once. This may be because it is unclear who is liable. It may be because you first want to resolve the case against one party. It may be because another party only becomes relevant if you lose or do not get paid.
A common example is a building case. You have suffered damage after work on your home. Perhaps the main contractor is liable. Perhaps the subcontractor is liable. Perhaps the consultant is liable. If you only take legal action against the main contractor, the claim against the others may become time-barred while the case is ongoing. A litigation notice under § 19 may then be necessary.
Another example is joint and several liability (solidaransvar). Several debtors may be liable for the same claim. You choose to go after one. You should then consider whether the others must be notified to prevent limitation.
A litigation notice is also important in recourse situations. If one party risks being held liable and later wants to make a claim against others, the others should be notified. § 8 has its own rules on recourse, but § 19 may be relevant when proceedings have already been initiated and several debtors are involved.
The most important thing is not to wait. The litigation notice must be given before limitation has occurred. If you only send the notice after the claim against the other party has become time-barred (foreldet), § 19 does not help.
What does "asserted in due time" mean?
"Asserted in due time" means that the claim has been made in time in a way that interrupts limitation. In everyday language: you have taken the right step before the deadline ran out.
§ 19 says that the claim shall be deemed asserted in due time against the other debtors if the conditions are met. This means you get a kind of deadline protection against them, even though you did not start full proceedings against them straight away.
But the protection is conditional. You must later pursue the claim against them within 1 year after the first case has ended. If you do not, the protection may be lost.
You should therefore keep track of the date the case ended. When was the settlement entered into? When was the judgment given or when did it become final? When was the case dismissed? When did it end in some other way? § 19 says "within 1 year after the case has ended". You should not wait until the last month.
What must a litigation notice contain?
§ 19 refers to the Dispute Act § 15-9. This means the notice must be given in a specific formal way. In a Rettsregel explanation, the main point is this: the notice must make the other party aware of the proceedings, and that the case may affect them.
You should describe which case has been brought, who the parties are, what the claim concerns, and why the notified party may be affected. You should also make it clear that you intend to preserve claims or rights against the notified party.
This should be done in writing. It should be possible to document when the notice was sent and received. Use a lawyer if the case is large or complicated. A litigation notice is formal. A vague email may be too weak.
If you receive a litigation notice, you should take it seriously. It does not necessarily mean that you have been sued. But it means that the case may affect you, and that someone is trying to protect a claim against you. You should read the notice carefully and consider whether you need to join the case, follow it or secure evidence.
What happens if you make a mistake?
If you do not notify the other debtors in time, the claim against them may become time-barred while the case against the first one is ongoing. You may then be left with no one to claim from, even though someone else was actually liable.
If you give proper notice but do not follow up within 1 year after the case has ended, you may still lose the claim. § 19 requires both: notice before limitation and later pursuit of the claim within 1 year.
If the notice is too unclear or sent incorrectly, there may be a dispute about whether it had any effect. A litigation notice should therefore be treated as a formal document, not as ordinary correspondence.
Examples
Marius suffers extensive water damage in his flat after work in the neighbouring flat. He believes the plumbing company is liable. The plumbing company believes the main contractor was responsible. The main contractor believes the fault lies with a subcontractor. Marius takes legal action against the plumbing company before the limitation period runs out. But he is unsure whether the main contractor and the subcontractor may also be liable. To protect his claim against them, he sends a litigation notice before the deadline runs out. If the case against the plumbing company later ends, Marius must follow up claims against the notified parties within 1 year if he wants to proceed against them. The litigation notice does not give him the freedom to wait for many years.
Eva has a claim against two former business partners. She takes legal action against one of them. The other receives no notice. The case lasts two years. When Eva loses against the first, she tries to go after the second. She may then run into problems if the deadline against the second has run out. She should have considered a litigation notice under § 19 before limitation occurred. Without notice, the claim against the second may be time-barred. This is a classic risk when you choose only one opposing party in a case with several possibly liable parties.
Common mistakes
- Suing one possible debtor and forgetting the others
- Sending an informal notice instead of a litigation notice
- Giving notice after the limitation period has already run out
- Not following up within 1 year after the case ends
- Not considering a litigation notice in building cases and recourse cases
What should you do?
When you have a case with several possibly liable parties, make a list of all of them. For each person or business: assess the limitation period, possible liability and the need for a litigation notice.
If you start proceedings against one, consider sending a litigation notice to the others before the deadline runs out. Do not wait until it becomes clear who is actually liable. By then it may be too late.
When the first case ends, set a new deadline in your calendar: 1 year. If you are going to pursue claims against the notified parties, you must do so within that deadline.